If you’re sourcing stainless steel parts internationally, J4 stainless steel is likely already on your radar. With many suppliers—especially in Asia—offering it as a “cheaper version of 304”, it’s tempting for procurement teams to consider it for their OEM or ODM projects.
But is J4 just a lower-cost drop-in replacement, or does it come with hidden engineering risks?
At YISHANG, we’ve served over 50 countries with OEM metal solutions for 26+ years. This article brings together technical expertise and hands-on experience to help you:
- Understand what J4 stainless steel is and isn’t
- Compare its true performance vs. 304
- Detect material fraud (“fake 304”)
- Make smart choices for fabrication and usage
Whether you’re sourcing kitchen hardware, enclosures, vending systems, or display racks—this guide helps you avoid expensive mistakes and protect your supply chain.
What Is J4 Stainless Steel? Origin and Composition
J4 belongs to the 200-series austenitic stainless steels, developed during global nickel shortages. To reduce reliance on expensive nickel, producers substituted it with manganese (Mn) and nitrogen (N). The result: a cheaper alloy with austenitic structure, reasonable strength, but reduced corrosion resistance.
J4 Typical Chemical Composition
| Element | J4 (%) | 304 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Chromium (Cr) | 15.0–16.0 | 18.0–20.0 |
| Nickel (Ni) | 1.0–2.0 | 8.0–10.5 |
| Manganese (Mn) | 8.0–10.0 | <2.0 |
| Copper (Cu) | 1.5–2.0 | – |
| Carbon (C) | ≤ 0.10 | ≤ 0.08 |
| Nitrogen (N) | 0.1–0.2 | ≤ 0.1 |
🔍 Insight: High manganese and copper boost strength and formability, but low nickel and chromium weaken corrosion resistance. That trade-off is crucial.
The “Fake 304” Problem and How to Detect It
A major risk in international sourcing is material mislabeling. Some suppliers quote 304 and deliver J4—capitalizing on their similar appearance. This scam, known as “fake 304”, can cause:
- Premature corrosion
- Customer complaints
- Reputation loss
- Compliance failure

Why the Magnet Test Fails
J4 and 304 are both austenitic stainless steels:
- Both are non-magnetic when annealed
- Both may become slightly magnetic when cold-worked
✅ Conclusion: You cannot identify J4 vs 304 using a magnet. It’s a myth.
Three Reliable Identification Methods
- Chemical Spot Test – Instant field detection of nickel levels
- Spark Test – Different alloys produce distinctive spark patterns
- XRF Analyzer (PMI) – Gold-standard for full elemental composition
YISHANG Tip: Require PMI certification on all stainless steel shipments to ensure material integrity.
J4 vs 304: Performance Strengths and Weaknesses
J4 is not “better” or “worse” than 304—it’s different. Knowing those differences is key to making informed procurement decisions.
✅ Where J4 Performs Better
- Higher Yield Strength:
- J4 ~325 MPa vs 304 ~205 MPa → Better dent resistance
- Superior Hardness:
- Rockwell B ~100 vs 92 → More wear-resistant
- Formability:
- Copper content improves deep-drawing → Less cracking during forming
Ideal for:
- Deep-drawn cookware
- Vending trays
- Decorative indoor components
❌ Where J4 Performs Poorly
- Corrosion Resistance
- Lower Cr + Ni = thinner passive layer
- Poor in salty, humid, or acidic environments
- Not suitable for NEMA 4X enclosures, outdoor racks, or food brine tanks
- Welding
- Prone to intergranular corrosion (weld decay)
- Requires ER309L filler for structural welding
- Machining
- High manganese = severe work-hardening
- Requires high-rigidity setups, aggressive feeds, and premium tooling
Bottom line: J4 excels in non-welded, dry indoor, form-heavy parts. Outside of that, it’s risky without advanced controls.
Working With J4: Fabrication Insights
As a metal manufacturer, YISHANG has worked extensively with J4. It is not an “unusable” material, but it demands specialized handling.

Welding J4 – Best Practices
- Filler Metal: Use ER309L (not ER308L)
- Technique: Limit heat, ensure fast cooling
- Post-Processing: Recommend passivation to rebuild corrosion layer
Machining J4 – Considerations
- Use positive rake carbide tools
- Avoid “rubbing” passes—causes surface hardening
- Apply coolant and use rigid CNC setups
📌 YISHANG uses custom tooling settings when machining J4 for enclosures and display frames to reduce insert wear and deformation.
TCO Analysis: Is J4 Actually Cheaper?
Initial material cost ≠ project cost. Smart B2B sourcing looks at Total Cost of Ownership (TCO).
TCO Includes:
- Material cost per kg
- Welding complexity / filler cost
- Machining time / insert wear
- Rust failure replacements
- Field returns / logistics
- Brand damage / lost customers
Case Example:
| Use Case | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Indoor control cabinet (deep-drawn, no welds) | ✅ J4 saved 27%, no failure after 3 years |
| Outdoor electrical enclosure (welded, coastal) | ❌ Failed in 9 months due to corrosion |
✔️ Rule: J4’s savings apply only in low-risk, low-moisture, high-formability environments.
Decision Matrix: When to Use J4 vs 304
| Application | Use J4? | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Deep-drawn pots, bowls | ✅ | High copper = excellent formability |
| Indoor vending brackets | ✅ | Dry use, non-welded |
| Coastal/marine hardware | ❌ | Corrosion failure risk too high |
| Structural welded frames | ❌ | Weld decay unless premium filler used |
| Cookware for acidic foods | ❌ | Poor acid resistance |
| Display racks (indoor) | ✅ | Cost-effective and strong |
YISHANG’s Final Advice for Stainless Procurement
J4 is not a fake, but it’s also not a direct alternative to 304. It’s a specialized alloy with high strength, excellent formability, but lower corrosion resistance. It must be used with care.
Before accepting J4 quotes:
- Ask: Is corrosion exposure minimal?
- Check: Will it be welded?
- Confirm: Do you have PMI verification?
At YISHANG, we guide international buyers through:
- Material verification (XRF/PMI)
- Design adaptation for J4
- Welding method selection
- Sample prototyping
Let us evaluate your drawings, volume, and specs to confirm if J4 is viable—or if 304/316 is safer long-term.
Contact us now to avoid material risk and optimize cost intelligently.
FAQ: Common Questions About J4 Stainless Steel
Is J4 stainless steel magnetic?
No. Like 304, J4 is austenitic and non-magnetic in its annealed state. Both can become slightly magnetic after cold work.
Can J4 be used for outdoor enclosures?
Not recommended. Its corrosion resistance is insufficient for rain, humidity, or chloride exposure.
Is J4 food safe?
For dry food contact, yes. For acidic or salty foods (e.g., vinegar, pickles), 304 or 316 is safer.
How can I test if a part is J4 or 304?
Use an XRF analyzer (PMI) or chemical nickel spot test. Visual inspection or magnets are unreliable.
Can J4 be welded?
Yes, but only with proper filler (ER309L) and skilled technique. Otherwise, it is prone to weld decay.
YISHANG Metal Fabrication
Over 26 years of OEM/ODM manufacturing for stainless steel enclosures, racks, cabinets, frames, and metal structures. Serving clients in electronics, vending, agriculture, medical, and energy sectors across 50+ countries.
📩 Email us with your drawings or quote request to get started.